<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The future of offline travel agents is online</title>
	<atom:link href="http://projectwander.com/2009/11/02/the-future-of-offline-travel-agents-is-online/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://projectwander.com/2009/11/02/the-future-of-offline-travel-agents-is-online/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 06:29:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Robertson</title>
		<link>http://projectwander.com/2009/11/02/the-future-of-offline-travel-agents-is-online/comment-page-1/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Robertson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://projectwander.com/?p=470#comment-174</guid>
		<description>Assuming this comment was NOT spam, feel free to discuss away. The floor is yours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Assuming this comment was NOT spam, feel free to discuss away. The floor is yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sql_injection</title>
		<link>http://projectwander.com/2009/11/02/the-future-of-offline-travel-agents-is-online/comment-page-1/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>sql_injection</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 23:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://projectwander.com/?p=470#comment-173</guid>
		<description>Dear Author projectwander.com ! 
I think, that you are not right. Let&#039;s discuss it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Author projectwander.com !<br />
I think, that you are not right. Let&#8217;s discuss it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Bowditch Travel</title>
		<link>http://projectwander.com/2009/11/02/the-future-of-offline-travel-agents-is-online/comment-page-1/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Bowditch Travel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://projectwander.com/?p=470#comment-95</guid>
		<description>Gday Jeffrey,

Like I said it was the hardest decision I made in my business probably but also the most liberating and, in the end, the most profitable.

But you&#039;re right, you do have to turn (some) clientele away but in the long run you will gain much more (and better targeted) clients in the future. I have also increased my range of audience from a pretty local one to an international one by specialising in just one part of travel, family travel.

Your mum needs to first work out what specialty or market she would most like to work in - or in fact which part of the market she currently services mostly now anyway and then go for it.

Specialising in something has several really important business advantages:

* you can become much more focussed in your own knowledge of a particular market and the properties, tours, and flights that suit that one market
* you establish yourself as THE expert in that particular market
* you dont waste precious time with tyre-kickers and those who want the cheapest fare to somewhere and you will never see or hear from them again
* you build a much stronger, much more loyal customer base because they know you are the expert in the type of travel they want
* your loyal customers will become a referral machine for your business giving you the type of quality recommendation that money cant buy: word of mouth

I understand that your mum might be reticent to jump in and start cutting her client base but believe me, in 6 to 12 months time she will be very glad she did.

Good luck mate,
Nick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gday Jeffrey,</p>
<p>Like I said it was the hardest decision I made in my business probably but also the most liberating and, in the end, the most profitable.</p>
<p>But you&#8217;re right, you do have to turn (some) clientele away but in the long run you will gain much more (and better targeted) clients in the future. I have also increased my range of audience from a pretty local one to an international one by specialising in just one part of travel, family travel.</p>
<p>Your mum needs to first work out what specialty or market she would most like to work in &#8211; or in fact which part of the market she currently services mostly now anyway and then go for it.</p>
<p>Specialising in something has several really important business advantages:</p>
<p>* you can become much more focussed in your own knowledge of a particular market and the properties, tours, and flights that suit that one market<br />
* you establish yourself as THE expert in that particular market<br />
* you dont waste precious time with tyre-kickers and those who want the cheapest fare to somewhere and you will never see or hear from them again<br />
* you build a much stronger, much more loyal customer base because they know you are the expert in the type of travel they want<br />
* your loyal customers will become a referral machine for your business giving you the type of quality recommendation that money cant buy: word of mouth</p>
<p>I understand that your mum might be reticent to jump in and start cutting her client base but believe me, in 6 to 12 months time she will be very glad she did.</p>
<p>Good luck mate,<br />
Nick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Robertson</title>
		<link>http://projectwander.com/2009/11/02/the-future-of-offline-travel-agents-is-online/comment-page-1/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Robertson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://projectwander.com/?p=470#comment-81</guid>
		<description>Well you are in the right place! Have you added me on twitter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well you are in the right place! Have you added me on twitter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Carver</title>
		<link>http://projectwander.com/2009/11/02/the-future-of-offline-travel-agents-is-online/comment-page-1/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Carver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://projectwander.com/?p=470#comment-79</guid>
		<description>I would be interested in the details. I&#039;m begging my mom&#039;s agency to consider specialization, but I don&#039;t have a very convincing argument if I can&#039;t explain the risks, benefits, and how to get there. I say &#039;specialize&#039; and she hears &#039;turn clientele away.&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would be interested in the details. I&#8217;m begging my mom&#8217;s agency to consider specialization, but I don&#8217;t have a very convincing argument if I can&#8217;t explain the risks, benefits, and how to get there. I say &#8216;specialize&#8217; and she hears &#8216;turn clientele away.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitted by nickbowditch</title>
		<link>http://projectwander.com/2009/11/02/the-future-of-offline-travel-agents-is-online/comment-page-1/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitted by nickbowditch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://projectwander.com/?p=470#comment-64</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was Twitted by nickbowditch [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was Twitted by nickbowditch [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Bowditch</title>
		<link>http://projectwander.com/2009/11/02/the-future-of-offline-travel-agents-is-online/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Bowditch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://projectwander.com/?p=470#comment-63</guid>
		<description>Gday Stuart,

I couldn&#039;t agree more with you mate. Specialising has to be the key to longevity - whether travel consultants are going to be offline or online.

It was the hardest business decision I have made to narrow my focus to only selling travel to families. The first few times I actually knocked back work that wasn&#039;t in the family demographic was horrible. But I am so glad I did.

Rather than trying to be everything to everyone - and failing - now I just have to know the family market, the customers, the destinations and the appropriate properties and tours.

The other bonus was as soon as I did this (specialising) my businesses took off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gday Stuart,</p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more with you mate. Specialising has to be the key to longevity &#8211; whether travel consultants are going to be offline or online.</p>
<p>It was the hardest business decision I have made to narrow my focus to only selling travel to families. The first few times I actually knocked back work that wasn&#8217;t in the family demographic was horrible. But I am so glad I did.</p>
<p>Rather than trying to be everything to everyone &#8211; and failing &#8211; now I just have to know the family market, the customers, the destinations and the appropriate properties and tours.</p>
<p>The other bonus was as soon as I did this (specialising) my businesses took off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://projectwander.com/2009/11/02/the-future-of-offline-travel-agents-is-online/comment-page-1/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 03:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://projectwander.com/?p=470#comment-62</guid>
		<description>No doubt the challenges facing legacy travel agents are formidable. Half the problem is with an hour or so of web research on a specific destination your average punter is going to have a better knowledge of a place than your run-of-the-mill suburban travel agent who reaches for a brochure on every question. As the info online gets better, easier to access and even more reliable and uptodate, this situation is only going to shift from dire to disastrous.

As it&#039;s not feasible nor practical to have a destination expert for every backwater worldwide in retail outlets, as per the example of Nick above, agents need to bite the bullet, reduce their footprint and specialise -- pronto.

In specialising they&#039;re going to lose the walk-in traffic who are looking for a package to Phuket rather than a hippo safari for gappers in Uganda, but they should dispense with the shopfront altogether, reduce their staff, work from home and reinvent themselves as the expert, worldwide for hippo gapper safaris. Shutting the retail outlet and going online to market worldwide for a tight niche is the only way a small business can scale this.

So who&#039;s going to look after the walk-in traffic that do want a package somewhere warm and really don&#039;t care about anything but the price? The web.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No doubt the challenges facing legacy travel agents are formidable. Half the problem is with an hour or so of web research on a specific destination your average punter is going to have a better knowledge of a place than your run-of-the-mill suburban travel agent who reaches for a brochure on every question. As the info online gets better, easier to access and even more reliable and uptodate, this situation is only going to shift from dire to disastrous.</p>
<p>As it&#8217;s not feasible nor practical to have a destination expert for every backwater worldwide in retail outlets, as per the example of Nick above, agents need to bite the bullet, reduce their footprint and specialise &#8212; pronto.</p>
<p>In specialising they&#8217;re going to lose the walk-in traffic who are looking for a package to Phuket rather than a hippo safari for gappers in Uganda, but they should dispense with the shopfront altogether, reduce their staff, work from home and reinvent themselves as the expert, worldwide for hippo gapper safaris. Shutting the retail outlet and going online to market worldwide for a tight niche is the only way a small business can scale this.</p>
<p>So who&#8217;s going to look after the walk-in traffic that do want a package somewhere warm and really don&#8217;t care about anything but the price? The web.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Robertson</title>
		<link>http://projectwander.com/2009/11/02/the-future-of-offline-travel-agents-is-online/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Robertson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://projectwander.com/?p=470#comment-61</guid>
		<description>Firstly, thank you Jeffrey for the awesome response to my post. In my &quot;day job&quot; I actually work in operations in a B2B capacity, so I would be looking after the people that interact with your mom on a daily basis. With accuracy of information, I think that’s a suppliers responsibility.  For example  for my guys I developed a Wiki database to capture all those “one-off” questions that don’t come up too often. I would like to hope all suppliers would be implementing something like this, but if not, this is something I think an agency could benefit from as well (Plus they are free). You can have a look here: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki
Your other issue about targeting the agencies specific demographic is a difficult one. I think maybe you have underestimated the level of computer competency that the older generations have these days. My father in law is around 60 and does quite well with computers and the internet, but their biggest challenge (Older generations) is navigating pages and systems that are over complicated or heavy with Jargon. Facebook is a good example of a user-friendly system that has been whole-heartedly embraced by all generations, but it looks like they already have a good group with a strong following.  
The honeymooners are a different story. Majority of the time you could assume they’re between 20 and 30, probably very in to facebook and could be active on twitter. I think twitter is something not everyone understands 100%, but from my own experiences I tend to shut off VERY quick if a company is going on too much about its own products. Alex Bainbridge has written an interesting theory on this here: http://www.smallfishbigocean.com/forum/topics/twitter-and-the-dead-mouse
If it were me, I would start an account related to Honeymooners with the actual agents photo as an avatar and provide non-biased info interspliced with their own promotions. There are some very advanced search programs can find key phrases and locations. 
Hope this helps, happy to discuss more though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firstly, thank you Jeffrey for the awesome response to my post. In my &#8220;day job&#8221; I actually work in operations in a B2B capacity, so I would be looking after the people that interact with your mom on a daily basis. With accuracy of information, I think that’s a suppliers responsibility.  For example  for my guys I developed a Wiki database to capture all those “one-off” questions that don’t come up too often. I would like to hope all suppliers would be implementing something like this, but if not, this is something I think an agency could benefit from as well (Plus they are free). You can have a look here: <a href="http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki" rel="nofollow">http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki</a><br />
Your other issue about targeting the agencies specific demographic is a difficult one. I think maybe you have underestimated the level of computer competency that the older generations have these days. My father in law is around 60 and does quite well with computers and the internet, but their biggest challenge (Older generations) is navigating pages and systems that are over complicated or heavy with Jargon. Facebook is a good example of a user-friendly system that has been whole-heartedly embraced by all generations, but it looks like they already have a good group with a strong following.<br />
The honeymooners are a different story. Majority of the time you could assume they’re between 20 and 30, probably very in to facebook and could be active on twitter. I think twitter is something not everyone understands 100%, but from my own experiences I tend to shut off VERY quick if a company is going on too much about its own products. Alex Bainbridge has written an interesting theory on this here: <a href="http://www.smallfishbigocean.com/forum/topics/twitter-and-the-dead-mouse" rel="nofollow">http://www.smallfishbigocean.com/forum/topics/twitter-and-the-dead-mouse</a><br />
If it were me, I would start an account related to Honeymooners with the actual agents photo as an avatar and provide non-biased info interspliced with their own promotions. There are some very advanced search programs can find key phrases and locations.<br />
Hope this helps, happy to discuss more though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Carver</title>
		<link>http://projectwander.com/2009/11/02/the-future-of-offline-travel-agents-is-online/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Carver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 01:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://projectwander.com/?p=470#comment-60</guid>
		<description>My mother manages an office in a Travel Leaders franchise, where leisure makes up the majority of business. I&#039;m doing a research project on their office, looking for ways to ensure they survive the years to come. It is indeed a  &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wicked_problem&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;wicked problem&lt;/a&gt; and if there was an overall theme, it&#039;s communication.

-They have no time or budget to reach out to new clients. 
-There is little attempt made to get feedback after a client&#039;s holiday.
-Through surveys I&#039;ve found that many potential clients hold misconceptions, like assuming an agency will always cost more.
-And it&#039;s not just communication with clients. Agents tell me that the most frustrating part of the job can be dealing with vendor reps. &quot;Can my clients bring alcohol aboard the ship?&quot; An agent can ask 3 times, speak to 3 different people, and hear &quot;yes&quot;, &quot;no&quot;, and &quot;Only a certain amount.&quot;

I&#039;m looking for solutions to these problems, and social marketing seems to offer a lot of possibilities. To me, the biggest opportunity is to engage the right clients.

There is a strong sense of independence in the internet generation. Not only can they book things themselves, organized tour packages often don&#039;t appeal to them. If they do go through an agent just for airfare, the profit margins are razor thin, and booking fees barely make it worthwhile. I have to ask if it&#039;s even worth it to grab these customers back from OTAs when there are more lucrative demographics out there. If your agency profits most off of tour/cruise packages (like my mom&#039;s), cater to those who want them. But who are they, and how do you connect with them?

The agency does have a Facebook fanpage with over 200 fans, where they post specials and encourage people to submit pictures of their travels. It&#039;s a good start. But I&#039;m concerned that they still aren&#039;t reaching the right people. According to my mom, honeymooners and the retired are the most lucrative clients because they typically enjoy vacations with some organization (packages). I&#039;m not sure how to reach this potential clientele, as honeymoons are one-time events and older generations have progressively less computer literacy.

The agency is keeping up with Facebook, google wave can give birth to a more collaborative  booking process, and twitter could definitely be explored. But I&#039;m kind of at a loss as to how we could best utilize these social services, given the clientele that keeps the agency in the black. Any suggestions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My mother manages an office in a Travel Leaders franchise, where leisure makes up the majority of business. I&#8217;m doing a research project on their office, looking for ways to ensure they survive the years to come. It is indeed a  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wicked_problem" rel="nofollow">wicked problem</a> and if there was an overall theme, it&#8217;s communication.</p>
<p>-They have no time or budget to reach out to new clients.<br />
-There is little attempt made to get feedback after a client&#8217;s holiday.<br />
-Through surveys I&#8217;ve found that many potential clients hold misconceptions, like assuming an agency will always cost more.<br />
-And it&#8217;s not just communication with clients. Agents tell me that the most frustrating part of the job can be dealing with vendor reps. &#8220;Can my clients bring alcohol aboard the ship?&#8221; An agent can ask 3 times, speak to 3 different people, and hear &#8220;yes&#8221;, &#8220;no&#8221;, and &#8220;Only a certain amount.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m looking for solutions to these problems, and social marketing seems to offer a lot of possibilities. To me, the biggest opportunity is to engage the right clients.</p>
<p>There is a strong sense of independence in the internet generation. Not only can they book things themselves, organized tour packages often don&#8217;t appeal to them. If they do go through an agent just for airfare, the profit margins are razor thin, and booking fees barely make it worthwhile. I have to ask if it&#8217;s even worth it to grab these customers back from OTAs when there are more lucrative demographics out there. If your agency profits most off of tour/cruise packages (like my mom&#8217;s), cater to those who want them. But who are they, and how do you connect with them?</p>
<p>The agency does have a Facebook fanpage with over 200 fans, where they post specials and encourage people to submit pictures of their travels. It&#8217;s a good start. But I&#8217;m concerned that they still aren&#8217;t reaching the right people. According to my mom, honeymooners and the retired are the most lucrative clients because they typically enjoy vacations with some organization (packages). I&#8217;m not sure how to reach this potential clientele, as honeymoons are one-time events and older generations have progressively less computer literacy.</p>
<p>The agency is keeping up with Facebook, google wave can give birth to a more collaborative  booking process, and twitter could definitely be explored. But I&#8217;m kind of at a loss as to how we could best utilize these social services, given the clientele that keeps the agency in the black. Any suggestions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.355 seconds -->
